Archive for January, 2006

New Clear

Why can't he pronounce it right?

How much effort is too much?

I was talking to a friend of mine this morning, namely , about how much effort one should expend to keep in contact with a friend.  I am odd when it comes to friends - always have been.  I don't have very many, but those that I do have, I try to keep.  Why?  Because it takes too much time and effort to make new ones.  AND I happen to think that those people I consider to be friends are truly interesting people.

I don't send Christmas greetings outside of my family, and I don't really take the time to write handwritten letters (though I do have some expensive equipment with which to do this, and do, occasionally, extend this courtesy to my friends).  But I do try to stay in touch through e-mail with most of my friends.  Or at least on IM when I see people log in.

This post results from a conversation I had with myself this morning (yes, I do talk to myself - but I don't answer myself - yet), followed by one with the aforementioned friend, , which followed on the heels of a thought I had this morning about giving up on trying to contact a mutual friend of ours.  What bothered me most is not that she hasn't tried to contact me recently; but that I had the thought that it's almost reached a point where I'm willing to give up making further attempts.  Yes, I have “only” e-mailed, but when the last phone call I made cost about $80, that's something I cannot afford.

I understand that people change… and when they grow up, or move away, or change to a point that they no longer hold interest in maintaining that contact, then there's really nothing that anyone other than they can do to change the situation.  But this particular person thrives (or at least thriveD) on contact with their friends, and I suspect they still do.  Which leads me to conclude that friendship is no longer desired.

And that's a rather bitter pill to swallow.

I've always wanted to write a dictionary…

Insert dream-sequence music here, followed by the clacking of my Apple keyboard…

3 entries found for asshole.

ass·hole   Audio pronunciation of "asshole" ( P )  Pronunciation Key  (shl)
n. Vulgar Slang

  1. The anus.
  2. A thoroughly contemptible, detestable person.
  3. The most miserable or undesirable place in a particular area.

[ass2 + hole.]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

asshole

n 1: insulting terms of address for people who are stupid or irritating or ridiculous [syn: bastard, cocksucker, dickhead, shit, mother fucker, motherfucker, prick, whoreson, son of a bitch, SOB] 2: excretory opening at the end of the alimentary canal [syn: anus, arse, arsehole]

Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University

ass·hole()  (shl)
n. Vulgar Slang
Pat Robertson. Founder of the illustrious Christian Coalition, failed presidential hopeful, and, ostensibly, Moses reincarnate.
story.robertson.file.jpg
(CNN) — Television evangelist Pat Robertson suggested Thursday that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's stroke was divine retribution for the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, which Robertson opposed.

"He was dividing God's land, and I would say, 'Woe unto any prime minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the [European Union], the United Nations or the United States of America,'" Robertson told viewers of his long-running television show, "The 700 Club."

"God says, 'This land belongs to me, and you'd better leave it alone,'" he said.

Robertson's show airs on the ABC Family cable network and claims about 1 million viewers daily.

Sharon, 77, clung to life in a Jerusalem hospital Thursday after surgery to treat a severe stroke, his doctors said.

Source: CNN Online January 5, 2006.

Just one more class act from the country that brings you George W. Bush and Big Dick “Biggus Dickus” Cheney. Real nice going there, Pat… kick them when they're down and can't respond.

Our Big Dick has spoken… it MUST be true…

When are we, as a nation, going to wake up?  Our Founding Fathers are doing more spins in their graves right now than Boston Market's chickens are doing on their rotisserie spits.



WASHINGTON (CNN) — In a robust defense of the nation's post-9/11 domestic eavesdropping program, Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday will say the tool is “critical” for U.S. national security.

According to released excerpts of his upcoming speech before the conservative think-tank Heritage Foundation, Cheney will say the program is necessary “even though some in Washington are yielding to the temptation to downplay the ongoing threat to our country.”


I wonder if the NSA ever thought of training its sights on Jack Abrahmoff, Tom DeLay, or any other of the corrupt members of Congress.  Nothing is more key to the security of this nation than the protection of our civil liberties.  Once those go, then what's the use of protecting the nation?