The New York Times is voicing an Associated Press news article out today reporting that president Bush has signed into law an act providing for a 700 mile fence along the Mexican-American border. The AP is reporting that president Bush is hoping this gives “Republican candidates a pre-election platform for asserting they're tough on illegal immigration.” Mr. Bush was quoted as saying at the signing ceremony, “Unfortunately the United States has not been in complete control of its borders for decades and therefore illegal immigration has been on the rise.”
Finally, something on which I can agree with the president: The United States has NOT been in complete control of its borders for decades. As a free nation, we have had famously porous borders, and have, since even before our founding ancestors came over from Britain, been a land of immigrants. My question is simple: Why stop now? My answer is even easier: We shouldn't. It's a waste of time. It's a waste of money. There is no conceivable way possible, short of such draconian measures as building a Berlin Wall-style fortress around our great nation, that this would be remotely conceivable. There's not enough M1 money to fill the coffers of the lobby that represents hotels up and down the coastlines… the Fed would have to increase the money supply, and there's no way they'll do that.
The key to solving this problem is the enforcement of existing laws, not the building of new fences. Instead of throwing our tax dollars down the will-be drain that is the new fence, build some sort of database that the IRS uses to cross-reference with the Department of Homeland Security; one that tags suspect (and presently ubiquitous) I-9 applications (such as those that have used identifiers recently in the past, or perhaps hold multiple positions), and then send DHS officials out to investigate those. If the people who have provided those documents to their employers can't provide the documentation to the DHS officials, further investigation is done, and, if needed, individuals are detained until it can be sorted out, or until some set time passes after which DHS has to release the individuals under the presumption of innocence. If the individual is found to be an illegal immigrant, send them back to their home country, to come back the correct way.
Perhaps an even better way of dealing with this problem is to provide protection for our country in the form of information. Our intelligence services are at a severe loss to tell us what is going to happen to our nation in the future. We're no better off today than we were on September 10, 2001, in terms of knowing what our enemies are up to. Neither the war in Afghanistan, nor the war in Iraq, have helped us one iota in improving our access to this knowledge. I would venture an inch out on the limb and suggest that these wars have substantially hurt us, depriving us of necessary connections that could lubricate the wheels that would help provide this information, but that's an argument for a different entry on my blog…
I don't agree with the fences… in the grand scheme of things, 700 miles of fence is a huge waste of money that could be spent better at defending our nation. And before you come back at me with it, yes, I'm well aware of the fact that the president didn't actually authorize money when he signed the bill. ALSO another argument for another day - unfunded mandates. This administration is rife with them. If they don't say “Iraq” on them, you might as well hang up any chance of getting money.
Recent Comments